with the previous example: A company in the middle (large and well placed) has decided to heavily invest in infrastructure and this has delayed salaries for 3 months (taking advantage of that production is seasonal and are currently under repair ), arguing that there is no money, but checks for vendors leave on time.
JUSTICE:
to-High Address:
The directors have decided to favor the main purpose of the Company over the remainder of the purposes today, we all know. In this case they have put aside all ethical principles, and analyze the effects of lying. Consider the effects of injustice. If this company
is able to commit the greatest injustice of all (not fulfilling the contract), is able to act unfairly in any other situation. A person or persons who made the decision not interested in the least safety or welfare of those who depend on it / them and tomorrow, with the same arguments (the danger of the lack of ethical values \u200b\u200bis that it is very easy to justify) may act in an unfair manner with any of his peers on driving.
also comes into play the concept of impunity (SAR: LACK OF PUNISHMENT) that generates a real vulnerability of the weakest, where the mighty (sad but true) sends the message "I can do what want with you. "almost something like" I belong. " This generates a ninguneo impunity that undermines the dignity, devalued to the point of the machines or less, as the machines, due to lack of maintenance or repair, "defend" increasing production costs).
Again, the question is: Can we build a company serious about this address?. I think not, since nothing prevents them from acting on behalf of itself and obvious prejudice the company in other circumstances. Lacks the ethical and moral boundaries.
b-Middle managers:
always and unfortunately, many companies are living the "law of the henhouse" (Above the chicken shit on the bottom), a repugnant idea, but real. This "law" power to injustice. Since the feeling of absolute power (do what I want with you, I belong), in this case, serves as food for the ego which is in the middle such as a life of their own dignity outraged. Broadcasting and promoting injustice down and further denigrating the most defenseless.
Again, the question is: Can we build a company serious about this leadership?. I think not, since nothing prevents them from acting the same way for their own benefit and obvious prejudice of the company. Lacks the ethical and moral boundaries. Again
generated internal violence and that deep down we all know the truth and we are aware of the ethical and moral boundaries, which can move the family environment and bear in tensions within the family, addictions.
c-The ratings:
The effects of injustice (and lying) on \u200b\u200bthe junior staff were (mistakenly?) Treated in the previous post, however I wish to rescue the ideas of helplessness and resentment generated by the injustice. It is a feeling unworthy (1), reduction of the human being under conditions (can not think of equivalence), impotence in the face of reality that can not change (even change), almost reduced to humiliating servitude. It breaks all the social capital the company and probably the direct environment. I repeat what the first post: that inevitably move to the home environment where the minimum requirements (we are talking about food, education and health) remain intact for obvious reasons and can earn in tensions within the family, addictions.
d-unions:
This is the first network of social capital is destroyed, the representatives of the workers are treated, at least traitors. They have a primary responsibility to protect the dignity of workers and their associated minimum value: Respect (1). This obligation is delegated, is the starting point, then comes any other work, which can run good or not so well and may be questionable, or not. I repeat: This is not good.
repeat: The question is not who is responsible?, But how do we change this methodology, this way of doing things?.
Until next time.
(1) Extraction: VALUES AND PRINCIPLES: Human Dignity and its ethical implications - J. Vidal-Bota
... Kant, in Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, says: "Act so that you treat humanity, whether in your person as in any other, never merely as a means, but, at all times, treat her well as an end. " Then insist on the same lines: "Well rational beings are all under the law that everyone should treat themselves and must treat all others never merely as means but always at the same time as an end in itself. Thus arises a systematic link of rational beings by common objective laws, this is a kingdom, which, as these laws are precisely the reference purpose of these beings to one another as ends and means can be called a kingdom ends' ...
... In short, while part of the world, man transcends and shows a unique ability - for his intelligence and his freedom - to dominate. And it feels impelled to action for this purpose. We can accept therefore that the value the human being is of a higher order with respect to the other creatures of the cosmos. And we call this value 'human dignity' ...
... Principles derived from human dignity
The first attitude suggests consideration of the dignity of every human being is to respect and rejection of any manipulation: in front of him can not behave as we behave before an object as if it were a "thing" as a means to achieve our personal ends. Principle of Respect
"In every action and intention, in any order and in any medium, is always to everyone - yourself and the others with the respect it deserves for its dignity and worth as a person" ...
